Improving pre-emptive access to the kidney transplant waiting list between 2017 and 2021: assessment of a regional program in Aquitaine / Amélioration de l'accès préemptif à la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale entre 2017 et 2021 : bilan d'un programme régional en Aquitaine.

Introduction: Pre-emptive access to the kidney transplant (KT) waiting list remains limited in France, with only 3.9% of patients on pre-emptive KT and 5.6% of patients registered at the time of initiation of dialysis. A similar trend was observed in Aquitaine. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a regional program in terms of access to the waiting list for patients initiating a kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Methods: We included all patients assessed for registration on the list between 2017 and 2020, 2017 being the reference year and 2018 the beginning of the program. Using the CRISTAL and REIN registries, we assessed changes in the number of patients on the list at the time of initiation of dialysis or transplantation. Results: The number of new assessed candidates increased gradually each year from 255 in 2017 to 352 in 2020 (+38%). The number of patients on the list sharply increased in 2018 from 229 in 2017 to 319 in 2018 (+39.3%) and then remained stable. At the initiation of KRT, the proportion of patients registered on the waiting list increased gradually from 7.1% in 2017 to 18.2% in 2020. The proportion of pre-emptive KT remained stable between 2017 and 2021 (around 7%) with a decrease in 2020 (4.6%). Approximately 60% of patients had a contraindication to transplantation throughout the study. Conclusion: This study showed that a regional program aimed at providing better information to healthcare professionals and patients and encouraging rapid assessment of transplant candidates could increase the rate of pre-emptive registration on the KT waiting list for eligible patients over 4 years.

Introduction: L'accès préemptif à la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale (TR) reste limité en France, avec seulement 3,9 % de TR préemptives et 5,6 % de patients inscrits lors de l'initiation de la dialyse. Une tendance similaire était observée en Aquitaine. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'impact d'un programme régional en termes d'accès à la liste d'attente chez les patients débutant un traitement de suppléance. Méthodes: Nous avons inclus l'ensemble des patients évalués pour une inscription sur liste entre 2017 et 2020, 2017 étant l'année de référence et 2018 l'année de début du programme régional. Nous avons évalué de façon annuelle, grâce aux registres CRISTAL et REIN, l'évolution du nombre de patients inscrits sur liste lors de l'initiation du traitement de suppléance par dialyse ou transplantation. Résultats: Le nombre de nouveaux candidats évalués a augmenté graduellement chaque année, passant de 255 en 2017 à 352 en 2020 (+ 38 %). Le nombre de patients inscrits sur la liste a fortement augmenté en 2018 passant de 229 en 2017 à 319 en 2018 (+39,3 %), puis est resté stable. À l'initiation du traitement de suppléance, la proportion de patients inscrits a augmenté graduellement passant de 7,1 % en 2017 à 18,2 % en 2020. La proportion de TR préemptive est restée stable entre 2017 et 2021 (environ 7 %) avec une baisse en 2020 (4,6 %). Environ 60 % des patients présentaient une contre-­indication à la transplantation tout au long de cette étude. Conclusion: Cette étude a montré qu'un programme régional visant à mieux informer les professionnels de santé et les patients et favorisant l'évaluation rapide des candidats à la greffe permet d'augmenter en 4 ans le taux d'inscription préemptive sur liste d'attente de TR chez les patients éligibles.

The Risk Of Waiting Up To One Year For Cardiac Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac disease is associated with a risk of death, both by the cardiac condition and by comorbidities. The waiting time for surgery begins with the onset of symptoms and includes referral, completion of the diagnosis and surgical waiting list (SWL). This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected surgical capacity and patients' morbidities. METHODS: The cohort includes 1914 consecutive adult patients (36.6% women, mean age 67 ±11 years), prospectively registered in the official SWL from January 2019 to December 2021. We analyzed waiting times ranging from 4 days to one year to exclude urgencies and outliers. Priority was classified by the national criteria for non-oncologic or oncology surgery. RESULTS: During the study period, 74% of patients underwent surgery, 19.2% were still waiting, and 4.3% dropped out. Most cases were valvular (41.2%) or isolated bypass procedures (34.2%). Patients were classified as non-priority in 29.7%, priority in 61.8%, and high priority in 8.6%, with significantly different SWL mean times between groups (p<0.001). The overall mean waiting time was 167 ± 135 days. Mortality on SWL was 2.5%, or 1.1 deaths per patient/weeks. There were two mortality independent predictors: age (HR 1.05) and the year 2021 versus 2019 (HR 2.07) and a trend toward higher mortality in priority patients versus non-priority (p=0.065). The overall risk increased with time with different slopes for each year. Using the time limits for SWL in oncology, there would have been a significant risk reduction (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: The increased risk observed in 2021 may be related to the pandemic, either by increasing waiting time or by direct mortality. Since risk stratification is not entirely accurate, waiting time emerges as the most crucial factor influencing mortality, and implementing stricter time limits could have led to lower mortality rates.

Waiting list and Post-Transplant Outcome in Sweden after National Centralization of Heart Transplant Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated an association between the annual transplantation rate per center and post-operative mortality after heart transplantation. In 2011, Sweden centralized heart transplants and waiting lists, reducing the number of centers from three to two. This study aimed to assess the active waiting time and pre- and post-transplant mortality rates before and after centralization. METHODS: Heart transplantations performed in Sweden between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020, were included. Background and donor organ supply data were collected from national registries (Scandiatransplant, STRAX, and SWEDEHEART) and Scandiatransplant, respectively. The Fine and Gray methods were applied to visualize cumulative incidence curves and conduct competing risk regressions. A Cox model was used to adjust for factors influencing time to post-transplant death across eras. RESULTS: When comparing the 10 years before and after centralization, the median active waiting time increased from 54 to 71 days (p=0.015). A decreased risk of mortality on the waiting list was observed in the later era compared to the first (SHR 0.43; [95% CI 0.25-0.74]; p=0.002). The total number of heart transplantation procedures (including pediatric patients) increased by 53% from 377 (mean, 38/year) to 577 (mean, 58/year) in the second era. There was a statistically significant difference in organ utilization between the time eras (p=0.033; Chi2-test). The 30-day and 1-year survival post-transplant rates for adults increased from 90.8% to 97.8% (p<0.001) and from 87.9% to 94.6% (p<0.001), respectively. An adjusted Cox-regression analysis showed a 63% reduction in 1-year mortality between eras (HR 0.37 95%CI 0.22-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide retrospective registry study examined patients listed for and undergoing heart transplantation before and after centralization of waiting lists and surgeries in Sweden. Waiting list mortality decreased, and 1-year post-transplantation survival rates improved.

Heart surgery waiting list management in an ultra-peripheral region: impact of a risk-stratified queuing method.

BACKGROUND: The management of heart surgery waiting list is essential, particularly in ultraperipheral regions. We aimed to characterise a cohort of patients awaiting surgery in such a region, and to assess the occurrence of adverse events and causative factors. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre analysis from 2016 to 2020. Patients were divided into "Urgent group" vs "Priority group" based on surgical priority. A composite outcome of death or hospital admission was determined. RESULTS: We included 329 patients, 18.2% in the Urgent group. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher prevalence of smoking habits in the Urgent group (56.7% vs 38.7%, p = 0.016), as well as the CCS class (p = 0.014) and EuroScore surgical risk (p < 0.001). Disease acuity indicated highest priority for coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Myocardial revascularization and aortic valvular replacement were the main procedures. Overall, 15.2% of patients received treatment within recommended waiting time, with 50.8% being Urgent patients. Urgent patients had higher risk for composite outcome (HR 3.92, 95% CI 1.26-12.22; p = 0.019), with fewer events reported (5% vs 17.8%, p = 0.051). Chronic kidney disease and previous open-heart surgery were independent predictors of this outcome. Chronic kidney disease remained as independent predictor at 1-year follow-up, while surgical priority did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar occurrences of adverse events on the waiting list, longer waiting times for patients in the Urgent group increase their risk of adverse events. The priority level had no impact on outcomes. Chronic kidney disease and open-heart surgery were independent predictors for events, highlighting their significance in the triage process.

Transplant benefit-based offering of deceased donor livers in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The National Liver Offering Scheme (NLOS) was introduced in the UK in 2018 to offer livers from deceased donors to patients on the national waiting list based, for most patients, on calculated transplant benefit. Before NLOS, livers were offered to transplant centres by geographic donor zones and, within centres, by estimated recipient need for a transplant. METHODS: UK Transplant Registry data on patient registrations and transplants were analysed to build survival on the list (M1) and survival post-transplantation (M2) statistical models. A separate cohort of registrations - not seen by the models before - was analysed to simulate what liver allocation would have been under M1, M2 and a Transplant Benefit Score (TBS) model (combining both M1 and M2), and to compare these allocations to what had been recorded in the Registry. Number of deaths on the waiting list and patient life years were used to compare the different simulation scenarios and to select the optimal allocation model. Registry data were monitored, pre- and post-NLOS, to understand the performance of the scheme. RESULTS: The TBS was identified as the optimal model to offer livers from donors after brain death (DBD) to adult and large paediatric elective recipients and, in the first two years of NLOS, 68% of DBD livers were offered using the TBS to this type of recipient. Monitoring data indicate that mortality on the waiting list post-NLOS significantly decreased compared with pre-NLOS (p<0.0001), and that patient survival post-listing is significantly greater post-than pre-NLOS (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In the first two years of NLOS offering, waiting list mortality fell while post-transplant survival was not negatively impacted, delivering on the scheme's objectives. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The National Liver Offering Scheme (NLOS) was introduced in the UK in 2018 to increase transparency of the deceased donor liver offering process, maximise the overall survival of the waiting list population, and improve equity of access to liver transplantation. To our knowledge, it is the first scheme that offers organs based on statistical prediction of transplant benefit; the Transplant Benefit Score (TBS). The results are important to the transplant community - from healthcare practitioners to patients - and demonstrate that, in the first two years of NLOS offering, waiting-list mortality fell while post-transplant survival was not negatively impacted, thus delivering on the scheme's objectives. The scheme continues to be monitored to ensure that the TBS remains up-to-date and that signals that suggest the possible disadvantage of some patients are investigated.

The impact of rising NHS waiting list times on elective surgery for Dupuytren's disease.

Waiting lists for elective surgery are increasing in the United Kingdom. We report a single-centre experience of disease progression of Dupuytren's disease while on the waiting list for surgery and its effect on the type of operative treatment required.

OPTN/SRTR 2022 Annual Data Report: Introduction.

The OPTN/SRTR 2022 Annual Data Report presents the status of the solid organ transplant system in the United States from 2011 through 2022. Organ-specific chapters are presented for kidney, pancreas, liver, intestine, heart, and lung transplant. Each organ-specific chapter is organized to present waitlist information, donor information (both deceased and living, as appropriate), transplant information, and patient outcomes. Data pertaining to pediatric patients are generally presented separately from the adult data. In addition to the organ-specific chapters, the reader will find chapters dedicated to deceased organ donation, vascularized composite allografts, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The data presented in the Annual Data Report are descriptive in nature. In other words, most tables and figures present raw data without statistical adjustment for possible confounding or changes over time. Therefore, the reader should keep in mind the observational nature of the data when attempting to draw inferences before trying to ascribe a cause to any observed patterns or trends. This introduction provides a brief overview of trends in waitlist and transplant activity from 2012 through 2022. More detailed descriptions can be found in the respective organ-specific chapters.

OPTN/SRTR 2022 Annual Data Report: Liver.

In 2022, liver transplant activity continued to increase in the United States, with an all-time high of 9,527 transplants performed, representing a 52% increase over the past decade (2012-2022). Of these transplants, 8,924 (93.7%) were from deceased donors and 603 (6.3%) were from living donors. Liver transplant recipients were 94.5% adult and 5.5% pediatric. The overall size of the liver transplant waiting list contracted, with more patients being removed than added, although 10,548 adult patients still remained on the waiting list at the end of 2022. Alcohol-associated liver disease continued to be the leading diagnosis among both candidates and recipients, followed by metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Simultaneous liver-kidney transplant was the most common multiorgan combination, with 800 liver-kidney transplants performed in 2022; in addition, there were 303 new listings for kidney transplant via the safety net mechanism. Among adults added to the liver waiting list in 2021, 39.9% received a deceased donor liver transplant within 3 months; 45.7%, within 6 months; and 54.5%, within 1 year. Pretransplant mortality decreased to 12.3 deaths per 100 patient-years in 2022, although still 15.6% of removals from the waiting list were for death or being too sick for transplant. Graft and patient survival outcomes after deceased donor liver transplant improved, approximating pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels, with 5.1% mortality observed at 6 months; 6.8%, at 1 year; 12.7%, at 3 years; 19.8%, at 5 years; and 35.7%, at 10 years. Five-year graft and patient survival rates after living donor liver transplant exceeded those of deceased donor liver transplant. Candidates receiving model for end-stage liver disease exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma constituted 15.5% of transplants performed in 2022, with similar transplant rates and posttransplant outcomes compared to cases without hepatocellular carcinoma exception. In 2022, more pediatric liver transplant candidates were added to the waiting list and underwent transplant compared with either of the preceding 2 years, with an uptick in living donor liver transplant volume. Although pretransplant mortality has improved after the recent policy change prioritizing pediatric donors for pediatric recipients, still, in 2022, 50 children died or were removed from the waiting list for being too sick to undergo transplant. Posttransplant mortality among pediatric liver transplant recipients remained notable, with death occurring in 4.0% at 6 months, 6.0% at 1 year, 8.2% at 3 years, 9.8% at 5 years, and 13.9% at 10 years. Similar to adult living donor recipients, pediatric living donor recipients had better 5-year patient survival compared with deceased donor recipients.

OPTN/SRTR 2022 Annual Data Report: Intestine.

Intestine remains the least frequently transplanted solid organ, although the survival and quality-of-life benefits of transplant to individuals with irreversible intestinal failure have been well demonstrated. The trend seen over the past 15 years of fewer listings and fewer transplants appears to be continuing, most noticeably in infants, children, and adolescents. There were only 146 additions to the intestine waiting list in 2022, and the proportion of adult candidates continues to increase, so that now 61% of the intestine waiting list are adult candidates. There has been little change in the distribution by sex, race and ethnicity, or primary diagnosis on the waiting list, or for those receiving transplant. The transplant rate for adults has decreased to 55.6 transplants per 100 patient-years, but the pediatric transplant rate remains relatively stable at 22.8 transplants per 100 patient-years. The decrease in transplant rates for adults is primarily the result of falling rates for those listed for combined intestine-liver, and this is reflected in the pretransplant mortality rates, which are twice as high for candidates in need of both organs compared with those listed for intestine alone. Overall, intestine transplant numbers decreased to a total of 82 intestine transplants in 2022, only one above the lowest ever value of 81 in 2019. No major changes were seen in the immunosuppression protocols, with most recipients having induction therapy and tacrolimus-based maintenance. Graft failure rates appear to have improved at 1, 3, and 5 years for intestine without liver, but this is not seen for combined intestine-liver. Graft and patient survival are better for pediatric recipients compared with adult recipients for both liver-inclusive and liver-exclusive transplant. Rates of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder are higher for recipients of intestine without liver.

The impact of Karnofsky performance status on prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Functional performance as measured by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale has been linked to the outcomes of liver transplant patients; however, the effect of KPS on the outcomes of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) liver transplant population has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the association between pre-transplant KPS score and long-term outcomes in HCC patients listed for liver transplantation. METHODS: Adult HCC candidates listed on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2017 were grouped into group I (KPS 80-100%, n = 8,379), group II (KPS 50-70%, n = 8,091), and group III (KPS 10-40%, n = 1,256) based on percentage KPS score at listing. Survival was compared and multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: Patients with low KPS score had a higher risk of removal from the waiting list. The 5-year intent-to-treat survival was 57.7% in group I, 53.2% in group II and 46.7% in group III (P < 0.001). The corresponding overall survival was 77.6%, 73.7% and 66.3% in three groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that KPS was an independent predictor of intent-to-treat survival (P < 0.001, reference group I; HR 1.19 [95%CI 1.07-1.31] for group II, P = 0.001; HR 1.63 [95%CI 1.34-1.99] for group III, P < 0.001) and overall survival(P < 0.001, reference group I; HR 1.16 [95%CI 1.05-1.28] for group II, P = 0.004; HR 1.53 [95%CI 1.26-1.87] for group III, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year recurrence rates was higher in group III patients (7.4%), compared with 5.2% in group I and 5.5% in group II (P = 0.037). However, this was not significant in the competing regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Low pre-transplant KPS score is associated with inferior long-term survival in liver transplant HCC patients, but is not significantly associated with post-transplant tumor recurrence.

Influence of HLA-A, B, and -DRB1 genes and panel-reactive antibodies on the waitlist time for kidney transplantation in the state of Sao Paulo-Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Brazil ranks second in the absolute number of transplants. However, the supply remains insufficient to meet the demands, resulting in a lengthy waitlist. This study aimed to analyze whether the frequency of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and the value of calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) would influence the waiting time for kidney transplantation. METHODS: The HLA-A, B, and -DRB1 frequencies and the cPRA value were analyzed in 11,186 kidney transplant candidates included in the waitlist from 2006 to 2016. RESULTS: The most frequent alleles were HLA-A*02, HLA-B*35, and HLA-DRB1*13. The overall mean length of stay on the list was 986 ± 1001 days. The mean waiting time for the three most frequent alleles of the HLA-A and B loci showed no significant difference when compared with the least frequent alleles; however, for the HLA-DRB1 locus, the most frequent alleles showed a shorter waiting time. In the association between HLA and PRA, the average length of stay on the list increased according to the candidate's degree of sensitization, regardless of the analyzed HLA frequency. CONCLUSION: The length of stay on the waitlist is influenced by the frequency of the HLA alleles of the DRB1 locus and the degree of sensitization.

Improving pre-emptive access to the kidney transplant waiting list between 2017 and 2021: Assessment of a regional program in Aquitaine / Amélioration de l'accès préemptif à la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale entre 2017 et 2021 : bilan d'un programme régional en Aquitaine

Introduction: Pre-emptive access to the kidney transplant (KT) waiting list remains limited in France, with only 3.9% of patients on pre-emptive KT and 5.6% of patients registered at the time of initiation of dialysis. A similar trend was observed in Aquitaine. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a regional program in terms of access to the waiting list for patients initiating a kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Methods: We included all patients assessed for registration on the list between 2017 and 2020, 2017 being the reference year and 2018 the beginning of the program. Using the CRISTAL and REIN registries, we assessed changes in the number of patients on the list at the time of initiation of dialysis or transplantation. Results: The number of new assessed candidates increased gradually each year from 255 in 2017 to 352 in 2020 (+38%). The number of patients on the list sharply increased in 2018 from 229 in 2017 to 319 in 2018 (+39.3%) and then remained stable. At the initiation of KRT, the proportion of patients registered on the waiting list increased gradually from 7.1% in 2017 to 18.2% in 2020. The proportion of pre-emptive KT remained stable between 2017 and 2021 (around 7%) with a decrease in 2020 (4.6%). Approximately 60% of patients had a contraindication to transplantation throughout the study. Conclusion: This study showed that a regional program aimed at providing better information to healthcare professionals and patients and encouraging rapid assessment of transplant candidates could increase the rate of pre-emptive registration on the KT waiting list for eligible patients over 4 years.

Introduction: L'accès préemptif à la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale (TR) reste limité en France, avec seulement 3,9 % de TR préemptives et 5,6 % de patients inscrits lors de l'initiation de la dialyse. Une tendance similaire était observée en Aquitaine. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'impact d'un programme régional en termes d'accès à la liste d'attente chez les patients débutant un traitement de suppléance. Méthodes: Nous avons inclus l'ensemble des patients évalués pour une inscription sur liste entre 2017 et 2020, 2017 étant l'année de référence et 2018 l'année de début du programme régional. Nous avons évalué de façon annuelle, grâce aux registres CRISTAL et REIN, l'évolution du nombre de patients inscrits sur liste lors de l'initiation du traitement de suppléance par dialyse ou transplantation. Résultats: Le nombre de nouveaux candidats évalués a augmenté graduellement chaque année, passant de 255 en 2017 à 352 en 2020 (+ 38 %). Le nombre de patients inscrits sur la liste a fortement augmenté en 2018 passant de 229 en 2017 à 319 en 2018 (+39,3 %), puis est resté stable. À l'initiation du traitement de suppléance, la proportion de patients inscrits a augmenté graduellement passant de 7,1 % en 2017 à 18,2 % en 2020. La proportion de TR préemptive est restée stable entre 2017 et 2021 (environ 7 %) avec une baisse en 2020 (4,6 %). Environ 60 % des patients présentaient une contre-indication à la transplantation tout au long de cette étude. Conclusion: Cette étude a montré qu'un programme régional visant à mieux informer les professionnels de santé et les patients et favorisant l'évaluation rapide des candidats à la greffe permet d'augmenter en 4 ans le taux d'inscription préemptive sur liste d'attente de TR chez les patients éligibles.

Trends in incidence and average waiting time for arthroplasty from 1998-2021: an observational study of 282,367 patients from the Scottish arthroplasty project.

BACKGROUND: Current waiting times for arthroplasty are reported as being the worst on record. This is a combination of increasing demand, the COVID-19 pandemic and longer standing shortage of capacity. The Scottish Arthroplasty Project (SAP) is a National Audit that analyses all joint replacements undertaken in the Scottish NHS and Independent Sector. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term trend in provision and waiting time for lower limb joint replacement surgery. METHODS: All total hip replacements (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR) undertaken in NHS Scotland from 1998 to 2021 were identified. Waiting times data were analysed each year to determine the minimum, maximum, median, mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: In 1998, there were 4,224 THR and 2,898 TKR with mean (range, SD) waiting time of 159.5 days (1-1,685, 119.8) and 182.9 days (1-1,946, 130.1). The minimum waiting times were both in 2013 for 7,612 THR - 78.8 days (0-539, 46) and 7,146 TKR - 79.1 days (0-489, 43.7). The maximum waiting times recorded were in 2021 with 4,070 THR waiting 283.7 days (0-945, 215) and 3,153 TKR waiting 316.8 days (4-1,064, 217). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first robust large-scale national dataset showing trends in incidence and waiting time for THR and TKR over two decades. There was an expansion of activity with a reduction in waiting time, which peaked in 2013, followed by an increase in waiting time with a plateau and modest decline in the number of procedures.

Cardiovascular risk trajectory and its associated factors among candidates on the waiting list for deceased-donor kidney transplantation: A longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for wait-listed kidney transplant candidates. Since cardiovascular risk is related to a variety of factors and may change with time, longitudinal changes in cardiovascular risk and related factors in candidates need to be investigated. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the trajectory of the cardiovascular risk score and its related factors in patients on the waiting list for deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). METHODS: This longitudinal study enrolled 144 patients who were registered as candidates for a DDKT at a transplant center in South Korea. During the 5-year follow-up period, 3 candidates on the waiting list were transferred to other hospitals, 19 candidates died, and 31 candidates received kidney transplantation. RESULTS: Approximately 26.6 % of the candidates had a high level of cardiovascular risk, and this increased to 53.2 % after 5 years. A high risk of psychosocial status (ß=0.351, p=.026) was the most significant predictor of cardiovascular risk, followed by higher comorbidity (ß=0.263, p<.001). Comorbidities were a significant factor associated with cardiovascular risk throughout the 5-year period, whereas the duration of dialysis and waiting time were significant only within 1 year after baseline. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular risk during 5 years on the waiting list for DDKT was associated with multidimensional factors, including psychosocial status before transplantation, comorbidity, waiting time for transplantation, and the duration of dialysis. In addition to managing comorbid conditions, shortening the waiting time and duration of dialysis is important for reducing cardiovascular risk during the long-term care of candidates on the waiting list for DDKT.

Liver transplant selection criteria and outcomes in critically ill patients with ACLF.

Background & Aims: Retrospective studies have reported good results with liver transplantation (LTx) for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in selected patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the selection process for LTx in patients with ACLF admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to assess outcomes. Methods: This prospective, non-interventional, single high-volume center study collected data on patients with ACLF admitted to the ICU between 2017-2020. Results: Among 200 patients (mean age: 55.0 ± 11.2 years and 74% male), 96 patients (48%) were considered potential candidates for LTx. Unfavourable addictology criteria (n = 76) was the main reason for LTx ineligibility. Overall, 69 patients were listed for LTx (34.5%) and 50 were transplanted (25% of the whole population). The 1-year survival in the LTx group was significantly higher than in the non-transplanted group (94% vs. 15%, p <0.0001). Among patients eligible for LTx, mechanical ventilation during the first 7 days of ICU stay and an increase in the number of organ failures at day 3 were associated with the absence of LTx or death (odds ratio 9.58; 95% CI 3.29-27.89; p <0.0001 for mechanical ventilation and odds ratio 1.87; 95% CI 1.08-3.24; p <0.027 for increasing organ failures). The probability of not being transplanted in patients with ACLF under mechanical ventilation is >85.4% in those experiencing an increase of 2 organ failures since admission or >91% if experiencing an increase >2 organ failures, at which point futility could be considered. Conclusion: This prospective analysis of outcomes of patients with ACLF admitted to the ICU highlights the drastic nature of selection in this setting. Unfavourable addictology criteria, mechanical ventilation and increasing number of organ failures since admission were predictive of absence of LTx, futility and death. Impact and implications: Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapeutic option in selected cirrhotic patients admitted to the ICU with acute on chronic liver failure. However, the selection criteria are poorly described and based on retrospective studies. This is the first prospective study that aimed to describe the selection process for LT in a transplant center. Patients with ACLF should be admitted to the ICU and evaluated within a short period of time for LT. In the context of organ shortage, eligibility for LT and either absence of LT, futility of care or death are better clarified in our study. These are mainly determined by prolonged respiratory failure and worsening of organ failures since ICU admission. Considering worldwide variations in the etiology and definition of ACLF, transplant availability and a narrow therapeutic window for transplant further prospective studies are awaited.

Tailoring allocation policies and improving access to paediatric liver transplantation over a 16-year period.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mortality on the paediatric liver transplantation (pLT) waiting list (WL) is still an issue. We analysed the Italian pLT WL to evaluate the intention-to-treat (ITT) success rate and to identify factors influencing success. METHODS: All children (<18 years) listed for pLT in Italy between 2002-2018 were included (Era 1 [2002-2007]: centre-based allocation; Era 2 [2008-2014]: national allocation; Era 3 [2015-2018]: national allocation+mandatory-split policy). RESULTS: A total of 1,424 patients (median age: 2.0 [IQR 1.0-9.0] years; median weight: 12.0 kg [IQR 7-27]) were listed for pLT. Median WL time was 2 days (IQR 1-5) for Status 1 and 44 days (IQR 15-120) for non-Status 1 patients; 1,302 children (91.4%) were transplanted (67.3% with split grafts), while 50 children (3.5%) dropped off the WL (2.5% death, 1.0% clinical deterioration). Predictive factors for receiving LT included Status 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, p = 0.001), Status 1B (HR 1.96, p = 0.016), Status 2A (HR 2.15, p = 0.024) and each 1-point increase in PELD/MELD score. Children with recipient's weight >25 kg, blood group O or awaiting pLT combined with other organs had less chance of being transplanted. ITT patient survival rates were 90.5% at 1 year and 87.5% at 5 years, remaining stable across eras. Risk factors for ITT survival were re-transplantation (HR 5.83, p <0.001), Status 1 (HR 2.28, p = 0.006), Status 1B (HR 2.90, p = 0.014), Status 2A (HR 9.12, p <0.001), recipient weight <6 kg (HR 4.53, p <0.001) and low-volume activity (HR 4.38, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, continuous adaption of paediatric organ allocation policies via the introduction of national allocation, paediatric prioritisation rules and a mandatory-split policy have helped maximise the use of donors for paediatric candidates and to minimise WL mortality without compromising outcomes. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Globally, paediatric liver transplant candidates still suffer from high mortality. Over recent decades, the continuous adaption of organ allocation policies in Italy has led to excellent outcomes for children awaiting liver transplantation. The mortality rate of paediatric liver transplant candidates has been minimised to almost zero, mainly using grafts from deceased donors. Paediatric prioritisation rules, national organ exchange organisation and a mandatory-split liver policy have resulted in a unique allocation model for paediatric liver transplant candidates and represent a landmark for the paediatric transplant community.

Is Dementia Related to a Longer Wait Time to be Assigned a New Primary Care Provider? An Analysis of the Nova Scotia Need a Family Practice Registry Derived from the PUPPY-Study.

Background: Access to Primary Care Providers (PCPs) is limited for many Canadians. "Unattached patients" are persons who do not have a PCP. Older adults living with dementia may face greater challenges seeking attachment. This study investigated whether older adults living with dementia experience differential wait times for PCPs compared to those without a diagnosis of dementia. Methods: This was an observational descriptive study of the centralized wait-list data from the Nova Scotia (NS) Need a Family Practice Registry (NaFPR). Time on provider wait-list by dementia diagnosis and age were compared. Number of days on the registry across these measures was estimated. Multivariable proportional hazards regression was used to compare hazards of remaining on the registry over time. Results: Unattached older adults living with dementia were on the NaFPR for less time compared to those without dementia (381.4 vs. 428.8 days, respectively). After adjusting for age, self-reported gender, comorbidity, rurality, income quintiles, and overall deprivation, older adults with dementia had a 1.13-fold (95% CI: 1.04-1.24) increase in the likelihood of leaving the NaFPR. Potential contributors to this small difference could be placement in Long Term Care (LTC) and subsequent facility PCP attachment. Conclusions: Analysis of the NaFPR exhibited similarly time to PCP attachment despite a diagnosis of dementia. This represented an effective equality model of health care utilized in NS. Future studies should investigate whether an equity model with priority attachment for vulnerable patients would reduce hospitalization and LTC institutionalization.

Transregional Study Highlighting the Increasing Burden of Urology Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings Around the UK.

Introduction The urology multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT) is the key weekly meeting that allows the opportunity to review results and discuss management plans for all urological cancers within a department. As populations age and cancer detection and management improve, the demand for the MDT will increase. We conducted a collaborative transregional study within the UK to evaluate the current workload on the urology MDT. Methods The study was divided into two parts: a multicenter retrospective audit and a snapshot survey. Three UK hospitals in Birmingham, Liverpool, and Cardiff were recruited into the multicenter study. Each hospital provided full MDT lists for all weekly meetings between August 2017 and 2022. Retrospective data gathered included the number of patients discussed per week, the average age of patients per week, the time allocated to their weekly MDT, and the total number of consultants in the department. The second part of the study involved the distribution of an online questionnaire to urologists across the UK to obtain a snapshot picture with the above parameters. Results Snapshot data from 34 different UK hospitals showed MDT length ranged from 1-6 hours, patients discussed ranged from 10-90 per week, and the maximum average discussion time was 3.8 minutes per case. Furthermore, 76% (N = 28/37) of respondents said unnecessary cases were discussed. Varied suggestions were provided on how the MDT could be improved. Multicenter five-year data showed a rise in mean total numbers of patients discussed per week in all centers: a 34.8% increase in Birmingham (from 34.5 patients to 46.5 patients), a 23.5% increase in Liverpool (27.2 patients to 33.6 patients), and a 38.8% increase in Cardiff (22.7 patients to 31.5 patients). Hours per meeting were Birmingham (2), Liverpool (3), and Cardiff (4), which meant the average minutes per patient discussion were Birmingham (2.6), Liverpool (5.4), and Cardiff (7.6). Conclusion There is a rapidly rising trend across UK regions for the number of patients being discussed in the urology MDT meeting. The MDT structure and function across the country are highly variable. There is consensus that the MDT discusses cases that are unnecessary, and this has been recognized for many years. Widespread implementation of the latest MDT management guidelines is urgently required to ensure MDT meetings are able to function effectively and efficiently into the future.

Changes in the Liver Transplant Waiting List after Expanding to the 'Up-to-Seven' Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

We aimed to assess changes in the composition of the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) after expanding from Milan to "up-to-seven" criteria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A consecutive cohort of 255 LT candidates was stratified in a pre-expansion era (2016-2018; n = 149) and a post-expansion era (2019-2021; n = 106). The most frequent indication for LT was HCC in both groups (47.7% vs. 43.4%; p = 0.5). The proportion of patients exceeding the Milan criteria in the explanted liver was nearly doubled after expansion (12.5% vs. 21.1%; p = 0.25). Expanding criteria had no effect in drop-out (12.3% vs. 20.4%; p = 0.23) or microvascular invasion rates (37.8% vs. 38.7%; p = 0.93). The length on the waiting list did not increase after the expansion (172 days [IQR 74-282] vs. 118 days [IQR 67-251]; p = 0.135) and was even shortened in the post-expansion HCC subcohort (181 days [IQR 125-232] vs. 116 days [IQR 74-224]; p = 0.04). Tumor recurrence rates were reduced in the post-expansion cohort (15.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.012). In conclusion, expanding from Milan to up-to-seven criteria for LT in patients with HCC had no meaningful impact on the waiting list length and composition, thus offering the opportunity for the adoption of more liberal policies in the future.

Developing Bespoke High Volume Low Complexity (HVLC) Theatre Lists With a Focus on Training to Address the Impact of COVID-19: A Pilot Study.

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on both healthcare delivery and surgical training. There have been significant efforts to manage the growing elective waiting list backlog whilst addressing the training deficit. We outline a successful pilot high volume low complexity (HVLC) program held at the Croydon Elective Centre between 2021-2022 which aimed to amalgamate training and elective recovery. Methods Two pilot HVLC training lists were carried out in June 2021 and March 2022. Three parallel theatre lists on each date were supervised by a single consultant floor trainer. All lists followed a standard pre-defined HVLC protocol. Trainees and trainers were invited to participate and encouraged to utilize these lists to sign off relevant work-based assessments. HVLC cases included hernia repairs and simple lesion excisions. Patient, theatre staff, and trainee experiences were collated via questionnaires. Results A total of one consultant supervisor, six trainers, and eight trainees participated in the pilot with a total of 34 elective procedures performed on 29 patients. The mean patient age was 52.4 years with 8 out of 29 patients being female. Of these patients 41.4% were American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Classification one, 51.72% were ASA two and 6.9% were ASA three. No patients to date were readmitted to the hospital post-operatively or presented with post-operative complications. One hundred percent of trainees felt satisfied with the training and would recommend it to a colleague. Conclusion The training deficit that developed during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave has been compounded by the second and third waves, and trainees are concerned that further waves are anticipated. Returning to operating is vital and our approach has been shown to improve training, whilst maintaining patient safety and accelerating elective waiting list recovery.